John Beverley Oke Oral History Interview

Interviewed by Timothy Moy

Interview Sessions from 1991
  • September 10, 1991
  • September 11, 1991

Abstract

An interview in two sessions, September 1991, with J. Beverley Oke, professor of astronomy, emeritus, in the Division of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy (PMA). BS and MS from University of Toronto. Graduate work at Princeton with Martin Schwarzschild on modeling giant stars. He describes continual development of improved detectors as staving off interest in building bigger telescopes until the late 1970s. Discusses his instrument building; mentions work of Arthur Code and James A. Westphal. He discusses need for more light gathering and the various designs for a 10-meter telescope, including his own; rejection of E. Joseph Wampler’s meniscus design. Recalls Caltech’s plans to partner with other institutions and his support for collaborating with University of California; Jerry Nelson’s design. Discusses UC’s funding tribulations, Keck Foundation offer, Caltech’s eventual equal partnership with UC, and UC’s uneasiness. Comments on debate over siting Keck headquarters. Nelson’s work on segmented-mirror setup; detailed discussion of optical system; difficulties with Itek. Altitude problems at Keck site, including oxygen depletion and its effects. Dome design and his part in design of Nasmyth deck and elevator. Discussion of advantages of Keck Telescope over Palomar 200-inch for various astronomy projects. He concludes by describing his work with Jeremy Mould on Virgo Cluster and plans for building Keck II.

Archival record in collection guide

PDF version of transcript [0.39 MB]

Preferred Citation

John Beverley Oke Oral History Interview, interviewed by Timothy Moy, Caltech Archives Oral History Project, September 10, 1991, September 11, 1991, http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechOH:OH_Oke_B.

Note to Readers

Oral history interviews provide valuable first-hand testimony of the past. The views and opinions expressed in them are those of the interviewees, who describe events based on their own recollections and from their own perspective. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Caltech Archives and Special Collections or of the California Institute of Technology.